honest answer incoming is the dosing anyone quotes for this from a study or from chat, whenever someone has a minute
#other-peptides 2026-03-12
Thursday42 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- c18_column — four months in, reporting the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, happy to be told otherwise. assay not certificate 19:08
- c18_column — weighing a two milligram vial at home is not a measurement, it is a hobby. the balance is not good enough, not a clinician 19:22
- alt_ast_ali — what is the strongest published evidence for this one, honestly, i did search first 19:51
one at a time, baseline first, assay the lot, write it down. that is the entire method and it is not sophisticated, happy to be corrected
counterpoint anyone reconstituted a 5 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
four months in, reporting the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, happy to be told otherwise. assay not certificate
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
nobody knows but is there a list anywhere of which of these have any human data at all
baseline month first
weighing a two milligram vial at home is not a measurement, it is a hobby. the balance is not good enough, not a clinician
⚠️1❤️12👀11
interested not confident
🎉1
nothing measurable
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
possibly obvious but whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication, sorry if thats been covered
nobody here is your clinician and this channel is not a protocol for anything, write it down with the date
what is the counterion situation on these usually
for the sceptics a supplier page is not a source. if the only citation is a shop, that is the finding, happy to be wrong. thats synthesis not fraud
baseline month done cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees, happy to be shown a real paper. get it tested
sourcing is patchier because the volumes are smaller, not because the suppliers are worse. placebo maybe
nobody here is a clinician and this channel in particular is not a place to take direction from, nobody here is your clinician
what is the strongest published evidence for this one, honestly, i did search first
🧊6🔥17
is the enthusiasm in this space ever justified by anything, not urgent — and anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
neither obviously wrong
how do people test purity on these, does Janoshik even take them — and is there a sensible way to weigh a two milligram vial at home
is there a reason the sourcing is patchier for the less common ones, idle question
about the counterion thing again does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
[edited]nobody knows but purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 98.6 on another
20:23quiet.hours pinned a message
that tracks
counterion is a bigger share
✅14💀7🎉8
honest answer incoming the enthusiasm in this space is mostly cheapness plus novelty and very occasionally it is justified
how do people decide what is worth assaying when the reference material is scarce
research use only material is not approved for human use, and that is more relevant here than anywhere, not medical advice
two labs disagreed
disagree but ok
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, same cold chain as anything else
ah ok
assay result on an obscure line has anyone had a fragment come back with an unexpected mass
no human data
what is established in here is a very short list, and everybody is comfortable saying so
good grief, how much is the question
community read was wrong
the labs charge the same for the obscure ones and the reference standards are the limiting factor, not the price
why does this channel have stricter evidence standards than the others