no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
#other-peptides 2026-03-29
Sunday47 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
i stacked three things for 13 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, thats just me
cant tell honestly
placebo maybe
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
[edited]injuries heal anyway
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
unrelated but anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
no human data
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
came back after 8 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, n of 1 obviously
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
did nothing for me
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a Homopeptide BPC lot
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
New independent result logged — GL Biochem, lot G-0641, purity 96.8% (Janoshik).
🤝18
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
🙏1
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
verification channel has some
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
📉4🧊2
update on the earlier thing how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
anyone reconstituted a 30 vial of these to 10 and had it stay clear
[edited]does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
ok so ran TB-500 alone for 7 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
evidence is thin
📉1🔥9🎉1
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
reconstituted 15 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
get it tested
slightly off topic but ran GHK-Cu for 16 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
PeptideMeter came back 98.1 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, thats one data point
TB-500 did nothing for me over 23 weeks and i stand by that a year later
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 8 months and never came back
Verification log updated: CPC — evidence added, status unchanged.
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
stack_sceptici log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard…
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all