sorry to jump in how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
#other-peptides 2026-04-07
Tuesday23 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- LC_MS_Lena — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, thats just me 21:54
- a1c_lag — ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, i could be wrong 22:33
- pbs_pip — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 22:46
- pbs_pip — reconstituted 2 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with 22:52
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, thats just me
medutest-report-a-2418.pdf
3 pages · 641 KB · not retained in the public archive
injuries heal anyway
verification channel has some
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, thats one data point
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
sorry to jump in is stacking three things at once ever defensible
Medutest came back 98.6 on a QSC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, ill dig out the number
Batch lookup B-0114: 7 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-11-27.
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 5 months and never came back
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
for the archive GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, i could be wrong
🔥18
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
peptidemeter-summary-a-2418.pdf
2 pages · 895 KB · not retained in the public archive
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, thats one data point
reconstituted 2 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
👀11🔥1📉1