vialroom

#other-peptides 2026-04-10

Friday48 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged. 22:46
  • gradient_greg — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 23:41
  • gradient_greg — i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, thats one data point came back after 10 months off and my baseline was… 23:46

ran TB-500 alone for 32 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

unrelated but secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening

i stacked three things for 4 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, thats just me

NN

sorry to jump in purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.1 on another

update on the earlier thing is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones

😂4

the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy

🎉2📈1🧊2
RT

follow up tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

one thing at a time

TO

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
ran TB-500 alone for 8 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

👍7🙏6📉3
VB

Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged.

LM

coming back to this people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees, for what its worth

[edited]
👀5😂2📈17

placebo maybe

sceptical but curious

VB

Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged.

👀9👍7

stacked, learned nothing

LM

whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication

coming back to this how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

🧊5🤝1
RR

anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same

*Janoshik not the other one

anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting

cant tell honestly

HH

quick one the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

RR

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

verification channel has some

RR

came back after 17 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

🎉15⚠️3😂2
RR

while im here oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same

medutest-report-a-2601.pdf
3 pages · 879 KB · not retained in the public archive
BB

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, thats one data point

TO

PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

P2

one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks

🎉3

does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s

⚠️1👀12
P2

for the archive is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent

GG

the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else

weights-monthly.csv
138 rows · not retained in the public archive
😂14📈1

injuries heal anyway

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, thats one data point
came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

📉4❤️17

*that should say weekly

P2

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it