did nothing for me
#other-peptides 2026-05-07
Thursday41 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- cat_on_the_tray — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 20:57
- cat_on_the_tray — how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing 21:04
- willow_waits — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 21:19
- willow_waits — while im here does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels 21:21
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
i stacked three things for 16 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, your mileage will differ
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
👍2❤️1
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
genuine question is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
[edited]placebo maybe
how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
no human data
unrelated but whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
💀5😂1⚠️4
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
PeptideMeter came back 99 on a WXT lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
[edited]💀1
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
evidence is thin
✅1
slightly off topic but anyone had a purity result under 98.1 on one of these
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a WXT BPC lot
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
ran TB-500 alone for 27 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
TB-500 did nothing for me over 27 weeks and i stand by that a year later
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
TB-500 did nothing for me over 16 weeks and i stand by that a year later
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
🧪12
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
❤️3
one thing at a time
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 98.6 on another
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
👀11🧊1
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
sceptical but curious
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
🧊17⚠️1
while im here does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
✅16
came back after 20 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, take that with a pinch of salt