ran TB-500 alone for 10 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
#other-peptides 2026-05-14
- ollie_orders — PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, i have it written down somewhere ran one thing at a… 20:47
- melb_meniscus — does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a FGP BPC lot 21:29
- VialBot — On this day 8 years ago this channel logged 81 messages. 21:30
- juno_joins — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 21:47
back after 20 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, i have it written down somewhere
ran one thing at a time for 2 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, happy to be corrected
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
came back after 25 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
ran it alone
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, anyway
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another, i think
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees
for the archive how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a FGP BPC lot
On this day 8 years ago this channel logged 81 messages.
anyone had a purity result under 99.4 on one of these
ok so i stacked three things for 25 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
evidence is thin
ran one thing at a time for 8 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult, i think
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 12 months and never came back
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
ran GHK-Cu for 6 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
baseline month helped
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
verification channel has some
did nothing for me
for the archive if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
TB-500 did nothing for me over 3 weeks and i stand by that a year later, for what its worth
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating