evidence is thin
#other-peptides 2026-05-22
Friday40 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- gus_charts — how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway 13:02
- sorrel_sends — ran TB-500 alone for 16 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 14:37
- igf_one_ivy — VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 16:33
- two_four_ceiling — does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s 18:18
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
📉1🧪2💀13
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
rodent data only
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
[edited]ran it alone
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
genuine question tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
ran TB-500 alone for 16 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
peptidemeter-summary-h-2814.pdf
2 pages · 861 KB · not retained in the public archive
🧊1🤝13😂2
did nothing for me
[edited]purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 97.4 on another
follow up secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
injuries heal anyway
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
get it tested
verification channel has some
transit-times.csv
339 rows · not retained in the public archive
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
back after 20 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
baseline month helped
💀15⚠️14👍7
sceptical but curious
[edited]VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
no human data
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
placebo maybe
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
stacked, learned nothing
🙏1👍14📉3
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
cant tell honestly
🙏4📈2🤝18
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
😂3
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
sorry to jump in cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
came back after 1 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
one thing at a time