ran it alone
#other-peptides 2026-05-30
- relabel_watch — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 16:06
- relabel_watch — i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included 16:09
- relabel_watch — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 16:12
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
evidence is thin
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
update on the earlier thing is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
quick one tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
ran TB-500 alone for 34 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, from memory
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
coming back to this i stacked three things for 21 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, thats just me
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back