for the archive anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
#other-peptides 2026-06-03
Wednesday39 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- reta_resting_hr — the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 26 months and never came back, i have it written down somewhere 16:48
- madrid_mg — nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing 17:29
- stack_sceptic — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 17:50
- nhs_pathway_nell — does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see 17:59
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 99.4 on another
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
while im here anyone reconstituted a 40 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
cant tell honestly
👍16🧊4📈15
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, someone check my working
baseline month helped
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, thats just me
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 26 months and never came back, i have it written down somewhere
⚠️1❤️1🔥1
ran TB-500 alone for 11 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
ran GHK-Cu for 29 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, someone check my working
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
sceptical but curious
rodent data only
🙏7
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
📈10👍1👀10
injuries heal anyway
✅2🙏9
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, your mileage will differ
reta_resting_hrthe secretagogue effect faded for me after about 26 months and never came back, i have…
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
🔥7
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
💀1🙏2😂3
ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
quick one cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, ill dig out the number
unrelated but no human data
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
TB-500 did nothing for me over 26 weeks and i stand by that a year later
one thing at a time
evidence is thin
stacked, learned nothing
get it tested