tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
#other-peptides 2026-06-17
Wednesday48 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
sceptical but curious
peptidemeter-summary-d-0718.pdf
2 pages · 471 KB · not retained in the public archive
Recon calculator: 2mg in 1ml = 4mg/ml.
back after 6 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a MKM BPC lot
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
right so one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks, we shall see
[edited]✅1👍1😂9
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
injuries heal anyway
anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
[edited]the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ill dig out the number
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
rodent data only
slightly off topic but no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
cant tell honestly
slightly off topic but the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
coming back to this took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
sorry to jump in anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 96.8 on another
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
Janoshik came back 99 on a TFC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
get it tested
came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
verification channel has some
🧊4
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, ill dig out the number
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
no human data
New independent result logged — GGPeps, lot A-2601, purity 97.4% (VendorInvestigate).
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 430 KB · not retained in the public archive
🎉1✅4
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
🎉14
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
📈9🙏6