took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
#other-peptides 2026-06-30
Tuesday14 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- reship_rita — the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 09:25
- reship_rita — Janoshik came back 99.2 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 10:47
- adelaide_assay — is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work 11:26
- adelaide_assay — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable… 12:37
rodent data only
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
🧪5🙏14
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
one thing at a time
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
✅1
Janoshik came back 99.2 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
💀9
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
baseline month helped
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent