people get pointed at verification because purity

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, verify it before you rely on it

if the only evidence is that people say it works, say that out loud rather than dressing it up, baseline month first

baseline month first

assay not certificate

the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

people bring good questions to this channel and the answer is often that nobody knows, that is preclinical, not human data

small vial question the counterion fraction matters more on the small ones because it is a bigger share of the mass in the vial, that traces to one study

a supplier page is not a source. if the only citation is a shop, that is the finding, that traces to one study

the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 7 months and never came back, that is preclinical, not human data

is the reconstitution arithmetic any different for the small ones

will report back, one variable at a time

research use only material is not approved for human use, and that is more relevant here than anywhere, happy to be wrong

the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, cite something that is not a shop

not just me then, did nothing for me

weigh the small ones