vialroom

#payments 2025-08-17

Sunday24 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • residual_solvent — follow up do not send a test payment to prove anything to anyone. that is a pattern, not a precaution i keep every transaction reference in a note with the order. it… 21:12
  • relabel_watch — i triple check the address and i have still had a moment of pure panic every single time, thats one data point 21:17
  • relabel_watch — nobody can verify an address belongs to who you think it does. that is the actual problem with all of this, i could be wrong 21:19
P2

the mods stop escrow conversations immediately and they are right to

check the total

is there a way to verify an address belongs to who you think it does

i wait for the confirmations the supplier states and then one more before i chase anything

CO

if you are asked to pay a second time because the first "did not clear", stop and post it in the scam channel

discount is standard now

🧊1
KF

for the archive i keep every transaction reference in a note with the order. it has been useful twice

RS

follow up do not send a test payment to prove anything to anyone. that is a pattern, not a precaution
i keep every transaction reference in a note with the order. it has been useful twice

work out the network fee before you take the ten percent discount. sometimes it eats it

RW

i triple check the address and i have still had a moment of pure panic every single time, thats one data point

nobody can verify an address belongs to who you think it does. that is the actual problem with all of this, i could be wrong

no chargebacks

check first and last four

transit-times.csv
710 rows · not retained in the public archive
CO

a bank transfer leaves a paper trail and no recourse. people should know both halves of that

has anyone been asked to pay a second time

GB

on a small order the fee can be a meaningful fraction. on a large one the discount wins easily

RS

unrelated but paying in two parts is sometimes offered and it does not reduce your risk, it splits it