VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on one lot and 98.1 on the next from the same QSC, both fine
#retatrutide 2024-07-03
- ferrous_ash — research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing 02:25
- ferrous_ash — energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me, i could be wrong 02:49
- subq_sy — stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again 06:19
- subq_sy — how long before people saw the first change at 15 07:00
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
low and slow
came off at 33 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me, i could be wrong
im at 1 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
[edited]Digest for the week of 2024-01-01 has been published.
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start, thats one data point
cant feel it honestly
appetite suppression at 0.25 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
[edited]glucagon is the new bit
smaller steps here
back after 2 months, has anything actually been published since
stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
TRIUMPH is phase 3
my resting rate went up 5 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 25
how long before people saw the first change at 15
the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me
phase 2 only