came off at 6 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
#retatrutide 2024-09-22
- batch_bandit — there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists 20:00
- group_buy_gwen — triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right 20:14
- swab_dry_first — the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, ill dig out the number 21:04
mine went up too
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
glucagon is the new bit
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)logging rhr daily
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
while im here how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
TRIUMPH is phase 3
[edited]anyone logging resting heart rate on this
triple agonist yeah
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, ill dig out the number
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)held at 12 for 16 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
phase 2 only
watching my heart rate
is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
coming back to this is the GI worse than tirzepatide or about the same
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
research use only
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
how long before people saw the first change at 10