vialroom

#retatrutide 2025-05-23

Friday22 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • step_one_sian — appetite suppression at 12 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point 18:51
  • factory_direct_fi — whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2 19:07
  • step_one_sian — the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here 19:39
  • triumph_watch — VendorInvestigate came back 98.1 on one lot and 99 on the next from the same QST, both fine 20:49
FD

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
came off at 15 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it

the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does

SO

appetite suppression at 12 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point

baseline  58
wk 2      61
wk 4      64
wk 6      67
wk 8      66
wk 10     65   (held dose from wk 7)
SO

the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here

🤝15📈9
TW

people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two

no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data

my resting rate went up 4 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 25

anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different SWB lots

sat at 5 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up

TW

low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom

settled by month three

triple agonist yeah

stepping in 2 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again

🧪5

nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is

how long before people saw the first change at 2.4