research use only
#retatrutide 2025-08-02
- rezept_rolf — buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely, thats just me stepping in 1.7 increments instead of… 11:58
- customs_owl — why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two 12:49
- customs_owl — research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing 12:53
- rezept_rolf — PeptideMeter came back 99.4 on one lot and 98.6 on the next from the same CPC, both fine, i have it written down somewhere 13:01
did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers
reconstituted the 20 vial to 2.5mg/ml specifically so i could take 1 without measuring crumbs
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely, thats just me
stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
*that should say weekly
is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
PeptideMeter came back 99.4 on one lot and 98.6 on the next from the same CPC, both fine, i have it written down somewhere
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
right so anyone logging resting heart rate on this
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
settled by month three
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data, for what its worth
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived