TRIUMPH is phase 3
#retatrutide 2025-08-21
- amsterdam_aliquot — i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps 18:33
- ferritin_fay — the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial 18:37
- amsterdam_aliquot — blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect 19:45
logging rhr daily
whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual, someone check my working
came off at 13 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
came off at 21 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
mine went up too
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
no long term data
quick one did anyone come off because of the heart rate
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
*PeptideMeter not the other one
research use only
held mine ages
anyone gone above 12 and what changed
low and slow
i said 2 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since