held at 0.5 for 13 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
#retatrutide 2025-11-08
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
for the archive GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
unrelated but triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
Testing queue: 3 submissions open, 23 awaiting dispatch.
coming back to this the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
watching my heart rate
Reminder set. I will post here in 5 days.
back after 3 months, has anything actually been published since
anyone logging resting heart rate on this
research use only
cant feel it honestly
smaller steps here
my resting heart rate is up about 6 bpm, did that settle for anyone
genuine question research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
sat at 5 for 4 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
held mine ages
came off at 26 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
*week 27 not week 9
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, ask me again in a month
stepping in 0.5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
no long term data
settled by month three
how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
coming back to this is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing
lost 43kg over 19 months at doses well under what the trials used
phase 2 only
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch
appetite suppression at 2.4 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point, someone check my working
TRIUMPH is phase 3
right so the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
update on the earlier thing TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two