watching my heart rate
#retatrutide 2026-03-06
Friday19 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- ghk_gia — im at 5 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal 21:51
- nhs_pathway_nell — sat at 2.5 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up 21:52
- bac_water_bill — stepping in 2.5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again 22:45
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, i think
im at 5 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
✅13💀15🙏3
sat at 2.5 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
⚠️14👍3😂4
appetite suppression at 0.25 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
glucagon is the new bit
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
🧪1🤝5🧊8
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
Janoshik came back 98.6 on one lot and 99.4 on the next from the same SGN, both fine
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom, ymmv
whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
stepping in 2.5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
🔥10❤️11👍5
anyone logging resting heart rate on this