the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
#retatrutide 2026-03-17
- declared_value — anyone reconstituting 15 vials to 2 so the steps come out smaller 19:16
- seizure_letter — there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists 19:28
- chlorhex — GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived 21:12
anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different GGPeps lots
anyone reconstituting 15 vials to 2 so the steps come out smaller
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
i said 2 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
research use only
anyone logging resting heart rate on this
stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
Channel stats, last 30 days: 32 messages from 28 members.
i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
TRIUMPH is phase 3
mine went up too
is the GI worse than tirzepatide or about the same
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting
glucagon is the new bit
did anyone come off because of the heart rate
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
coming back to this PeptideMeter came back 99.4 on one lot and 98.6 on the next from the same FGP, both fine
came off at 7 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
logging rhr daily
lost 23kg over 8 months at doses well under what the trials used
[edited]