a certificate is not an assay

interesting, cant feel it honestly

independent purity testing is the one part of this where the room has anything solid, and it is worth paying for, written down with the date

hope it settles, phase two is what we have

mine went up too

unrelated but a baseline panel before starting is the only way to say anything at all about your own numbers afterwards, thin evidence, held lightly

we are not clinicians and this one especially is not a compound to be casual about, i would want phase three first

assay not certificate

being careful here heart rate increases were reported in the published trials and they are also reported here, which is at least consistent, one persons data

i would rather this channel was small and careful than large and confident, could be misremembering

i would want a completed phase three and independent assay work before i called any of this established, that is extrapolation

sourcing question for this one how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use, i can post the details