is the phase three programme actually running

assay came back phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual

i would want a completed phase three and independent assay work before i called any of this established

there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists

did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end, trying to get this right before i do anything

the honest answer is that the phase two data is what we have and it does not cover long term anything

logging this properly, so TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule

bloods rather than scales is the only tracking that adds anything to what is already known, standards apply harder here

logged rhr daily

i stopped because my own numbers moved in a direction i did not like, and i am not going to generalise from that, evidence standards are strict here for a reason

a baseline panel before starting is the only way to say anything at all about your own numbers afterwards, happy to be told otherwise

strict channel so store it as you would any lyophilised peptide. nothing about this molecule changes the cold chain