sharing your own bloods is fine, sharing someone elses without asking is not
nobody will decide for you, thats the only thing consistently enforced
🎉5🔥1
#rules 2026-03-28
Saturday25 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- red_flag_ruby — sharing your own bloods is fine, sharing someone elses without asking is not nobody will decide for you, thats the only thing consistently enforced 20:16
- red_flag_ruby — i was wrong about this for a year. the rule isnt no naming, its no accusing 20:27
- VialBot — On this day 6 years ago this channel logged 112 messages. 20:44
- transit_degrade — the personal info rule is why you never see an employer or a real name in these logs 21:28
*Janoshik not the other one
i was wrong about this for a year. the rule isnt no naming, its no accusing
[edited]site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 382 KB · not retained in the public archive
📈1😂9👀1
for one and two its usually a note and thats it, people forget and its fine
grey area that one
does the no selling rule apply to giving something away
reported a private offer once, it was dealt with in about an hour and nobody made a fuss
On this day 6 years ago this channel logged 112 messages.
half the enforcement is members saying that sounds like advice, mate
the pinned version is short on purpose, the long version just repeats it with more words
giving something away still counts under three, it went the same way as selling when someone tried
still disagree tbh
sorry to jump in mods are held to two harder than anyone, ive watched one correct himself mid sentence, someone check my working
while im here can i ask about a specific batch in here or does that go to verification
the pattern is helpful in public then a better price in private, and it only works in private, not advice obviously
why is the private message rule first, it looks like the least harmful of the five
the personal info rule is why you never see an employer or a real name in these logs
🤝3🔥16❤️1
asking what something costs is fine. asking someone to arrange it for you is not, anyway
red_flag_rubythe pinned version is short on purpose, the long version just repeats it with more words
right so asking what dose someone went to is a request for a report, which is the entire point of the place
the line is grammar. this happened to me is a report, you should do this is an instruction
unrelated but does asking which vendor is cheapest count as sourcing
yeah thats three
the useful part was never the instruction. the maths and the trials and the failures are all still here
no, thats allowed
*that should say weekly