vialroom

#scam-watch 2025-08-23

Saturday50 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • apob_over_ldl — an anonymous group buy organiser holding other peoples money is the highest risk arrangement in this hobby 11:11
  • apob_over_ldl — the room holds no money and runs no escrow. anybody offering to is speaking for themselves 11:47
  • food_noise_off — a reply from a different address than the one you wrote to is worth stopping over 13:15
  • typosquat_tay — slightly off topic but report it even if nothing happens. the pattern is the value, not the individual case 13:35
AO

an anonymous group buy organiser holding other peoples money is the highest risk arrangement in this hobby

🧪11❤️18
DO

nobody legitimate contacts you unsolicited offering a discount. report it, do not reply

no escrow here

pressure tactic

🧪11😂7

impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money

AO

the room holds no money and runs no escrow. anybody offering to is speaking for themselves

⚠️8
AO

tracking number does not resolve on any carrier, is that a fake

[edited]

i was wrong to call something a scam in 2024 and it was a fill problem. i try to remember that

CC

we do not name private individuals in this channel. that is why some lines here are redacted

certificate looks recycled from another lot, second opinion
a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear

right so a chromatogram that appears on two different lots is forged. not sloppy, forged

advance payment for a "reservation", has anyone seen this pattern

CC

fraud means somebody set out to take your money or deceive you about what is in the vial. keep the words separate

DO

how do you check a domain is the real one without clicking it
relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime

DO

for the archive a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam
a chromatogram that appears on two different lots is forged. not sloppy, forged

FN

do not engage. do not negotiate. do not send a test payment. screenshot and post it

a reply from a different address than the one you wrote to is worth stopping over

🙏2💀3⚠️18

*VendorInvestigate not the other one

if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can

DO

the lookalike domains almost always differ by one doubled letter, a swapped letter, or an added hyphen, ymmv

a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear

LL

read the domain character by character. that is the entire defence and it works, we shall see

is a bad batch ever grounds for calling something a scam

is a hyphenated version of a real domain always fake

TT

added to the watchlist
the careful version of this channel is worth ten times the angry version

slightly off topic but report it even if nothing happens. the pattern is the value, not the individual case

📈6🙏2

coming back after 19 months, is the watchlist still maintained

is it worth reporting or does nothing happen

DO

ok so relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime
a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear

AH

the careful version of this channel is worth ten times the angry version

DO

follow up update from 16 months ago: the domain from that report is still live and still fake

🔥1

coming back to this thats forged
the watchlist is pinned and maintained. add anything you find with a screenshot

report it

thats retail not fraud

📈10
TT

i have never seen a real supplier ask for payment to a personal account