vialroom

#scam-watch 2025-10-06

Monday43 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • underfill_uma — relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime 06:26
  • underfill_uma — if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can 06:36
  • nordic_price_nils — the room holds no money and runs no escrow. anybody offering to is speaking for themselves 07:35
MN

impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money

MN

quick one this domain is one letter off the real one, adding it to the watchlist

🧊181
SH

do not engage. do not negotiate. do not send a test payment. screenshot and post it

NP

nobody legitimate contacts you unsolicited offering a discount. report it, do not reply

advance payment for a "reservation", has anyone seen this pattern

MP

a chromatogram that appears on two different lots is forged. not sloppy, forged
a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam

MN

a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear, take that with a pinch of salt

[edited]

fraud means somebody set out to take your money or deceive you about what is in the vial. keep the words separate, your mileage will differ

i was wrong to call something a scam in 2024 and it was a fill problem. i try to remember that
relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime

UU

read it character by character

transit-times.csv
881 rows · not retained in the public archive

if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can

janoshik-sg-1177.pdf
2 pages · 336 KB · not retained in the public archive
😂1🧪14

unrelated but how do you check a domain is the real one without clicking it

TT

coming back to this the careful version of this channel is worth ten times the angry version

TT

they asked for a second payment because the first one "did not clear"

⚠️3📈1🧊12

got an unsolicited message offering a discount, is this a known thing

we do not name private individuals in this channel. that is why some lines here are redacted, take that with a pinch of salt

UU

a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam

RO

coming back after 15 months, is the watchlist still maintained

RO

unrelated but somebody is using the room name to sell things, who do i tell

redacting that

a discount that expires in an hour is a pressure tactic and it is the oldest one there is

👀4⚠️16🧪1

screenshot it

👀36❤️17
UU

while im here the lookalike domains almost always differ by one doubled letter, a swapped letter, or an added hyphen, ask me again in a month

UU

what is the actual advice, just do not engage
read the domain character by character. that is the entire defence and it works

CH

a fake tracking number that resolves on no carrier at all is conclusive. one that resolves and stalls is not

CH

report it even if nothing happens. the pattern is the value, not the individual case

👍4

unrelated but read the domain character by character. that is the entire defence and it works, i could be wrong

14
MP

certificate looks recycled from another lot, second opinion