vialroom
Thread · #scam-watch · 2025-12-17

a bad batch is not a scam

Spun off from a message in #scam-watch on 2025-12-17. 13 messages, 4 participants.

The message this came from
  • reship_rita — checked the registry, so a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam, screenshot the url as well 22:22
SB

quick one is a bad batch ever grounds for calling something a scam, or is the pinned answer still current

FT

asked the lab about a reference a bad batch is a quality problem and fraud is an intent problem. this channel is only about the second one, patterns not names

RR

impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money, the real company will want to know

RR

if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can, that is the usual template

NC

i was wrong to call something a scam in 2024 and it was a fill problem. i try to remember that, it will be gone in a fortnight and back under another name

NC

relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime

FT

never post someone real name or personal details here. the channel is about domains and documents, pressure is the tell

📉9
SB

the operator wants a decision made quickly. every part of the approach is built to shorten your thinking time, nothing here is legal advice

SB

screenshot with the address bar visible, always. a screenshot of a page with no url is a picture of some text

[edited]