vialroom

#semaglutide 2025-01-17

Friday47 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • a1c_lag — licensed ceiling for weight is 2.4 weekly, anything above that is not a licensed dose 21:15
  • first_and_last_four — SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial, i have it written down somewhere 21:24
  • a1c_lag — five week steps worked better for me than four, purely on how the second week felt 22:50
HL

my 5 vial in 2.5ml gives 2.5mg/ml so 10 lands on 50 units, thats why i picked that volume

IS

i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that, ill dig out the number

going slow cost me nothing except time and saved me two bad weeks, thats my whole contribution

is there a reason to hold at 1.7 rather than going to 2.4

HL

STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it

i held at 1.7 for 4 months and it was the best decision i made

FLOW was the kidney outcomes trial and it gets quoted in here for things it didnt measure, happy to be corrected

same dose day

*that should say weekly

TT

STEP 1 ran to 68 weeks. thats the one everyone half remembers

FA

SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial, i have it written down somewhere

👀18😂1
VB

New independent result logged — HJ, lot C-4402, purity 99.2% (PeptideMeter).

SD

13 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half

13

$94 a month for compounded against what brand costs locally is why most people here use vials

did anybody find a difference between QST and pharmacy at the same 5

TT

if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule

SD

dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not because sunday matters

slightly off topic but the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing

EE

the appetite effect faded for me around 3 months and going up fixed it for a while

not the same trial

slower worked better

went too fast once

EE

changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels
24 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half

TT

update on the earlier thing does moving my dose day by two days matter with a seven day half life

held there too

steady state is the bit people skip, judging a new dose after eight days tells you almost nothing

SB

how many weeks before you noticed anything at 2

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance
A1

my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem

five week steps worked better for me than four, purely on how the second week felt

🙏2💀14🧪12
A1

STEP 4 had the withdrawal arm, thats the one people quote when they talk about stopping

A1

follow up is 2.4 the top or do people go past it

while im here my Janoshik report on the HJ vial came back 96.8 against a certificate saying 99.4

FA

genuine question held at 12 and lost 73lb over 23 months, slower than the trials and fine by me

A1

genuine question vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong