held there too
🤝1👀1
#semaglutide 2025-05-31
Saturday23 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- madrid_mg — follow up changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels 12:59
- blank_run — the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not… 13:04
- triumph_watch — my PeptideMeter report on the ERP vial came back 98.1 against a certificate saying 96.8 15:02
i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication
not the same trial
same dose day
is the plateau at 19 weeks normal or am i doing something wrong
going slow cost me nothing except time and saved me two bad weeks, thats my whole contribution
[edited]STEP 4 had the withdrawal arm, thats the one people quote when they talk about stopping
follow up changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels
went too fast once
⚠️16🙏18❤️13
give it four weeks
the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing
dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not because sunday matters
i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that
im 4 months in at 0.25 and the appetite effect faded, is that a thing
slower worked better
anyone compared their 8 vial dosing against the pen increments
my PeptideMeter report on the ERP vial came back 98.1 against a certificate saying 96.8
STEP 1 ran to 68 weeks. thats the one everyone half remembers
held at 10 and lost 104lb over 19 months, slower than the trials and fine by me
unrelated but STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it
is there a reason to hold at 1.7 rather than going to 2.4
did the STEP 4 withdrawal arm show what i think it showed