my PeptideMeter report on the BCH vial came back 98.1 against a certificate saying 96.8
#semaglutide 2025-10-30
- hydrate_hana — my PeptideMeter report on the BCH vial came back 98.1 against a certificate saying 96.8 23:10
- non_scale_win — i held at 15 for 5 months and it was the best decision i made 23:14
- hydrate_hana — went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step, i could be wrong 23:18
- hydrate_hana — how many weeks before you noticed anything at 2.4 23:19
- wrong_network — moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me, i could be wrong 23:40
not the same trial
i held at 15 for 5 months and it was the best decision i made
wk 1-4 0.25mg
wk 5-10 0.50mg (held 2 extra weeks)
wk 11-14 1.00mg
wk 15-26 1.70mg (held, long)
wk 27+ 2.40mgsorry to jump in does anyone actually run a five week step instead of four
how long did the first 20kg take for people at the low doses
went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step, i could be wrong
how many weeks before you noticed anything at 2.4
went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down
going slow cost me nothing except time and saved me two bad weeks, thats my whole contribution
right so dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not because sunday matters
half life is about a week so youre roughly four to five weeks to steady state on any new dose
my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem
went too fast once
the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing
mine faded too
moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me, i could be wrong
sorry to jump in lost about 15kg on the low doses before i even got to 1, which surprised me, take that with a pinch of salt
€185 a month for compounded against what brand costs locally is why most people here use vials
same dose day
FLOW was the kidney outcomes trial and it gets quoted in here for things it didnt measure
is there a reason to hold at 1.7 rather than going to 2.4