smaller each step
12 months at 2.4 and the honest summary
Spun off from a message in #semaglutide on 2025-03-16. 16 messages, 3 participants.
- impersonator_ip — 12 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half, that is my read of the paper 15:33
second year update the first week back after a break hits harder for me than any step ever did, that is a tolerability schedule
the tape moved
the first month is not representative of anything, everybody in here says so, and nobody believes it at the time
wrote it down
steady state is the bit people skip, judging a new dose after eight days tells you almost nothing
quoting SELECT properly for once i stayed on 1.7 for 3 months and never went to 2.4, appetite was already where i needed it, the population is not us
four week average
a hold is a decision. holding at 0.5 for six months because it works is not failing to progress, n of 1 as always
steady state takes weeks
held at 1.7 and lost 80lb over 14 months, slower than the trials and fine by me, research use only
week 2 at 1 and does the pen and the vial land differently for anyone or should they be identical
one lot, one person, 12 months, and i say so every time i put a number in here, in the population they studied
small correction to what i said earlier stopping at target without a plan is the single most common regret posted in this channel
the appetite effect settling rather than swinging is what most people describe by about month three
the fortnight after a step is where my whole year of loss actually happened, added up, n of 1 as always