anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs
#test-results 2024-06-09
- luerlok — my sheet has 4 lots from BCH with a spread under a point, which is tight, your mileage will differ 23:16
- HPLC_Hank — update from 20 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, ask me again in a month 23:17
- HPLC_Hank — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such 23:21
- area_percent — how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance 23:35
my sheet has 4 lots from BCH with a spread under a point, which is tight, your mileage will differ
update from 20 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, ask me again in a month
selection bias
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
thats a fill problem
attach the pdf
weigh it first
thats within range
for the archive how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
99.4 against a certificate of 96.8 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
when did you buy it
whats the lot
genuine question how much does sample handling on my end affect the number
for the archive i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, i have it written down somewhere
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure