a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
#test-results 2024-07-06
- HPLC_Hank — a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 19:34
- gip_glp_gil — genuine question a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 19:36
- u100_pat — update on the earlier thing a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 19:44
- u100_pat — for the archive is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share 20:18
- VialBot — Verification log updated: Homopeptide — evidence added, status unchanged. 20:37
genuine question a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
nice result
update on the earlier thing a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
attach the pdf
how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
for the archive is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
Verification log updated: Homopeptide — evidence added, status unchanged.
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
test it again
log the boring ones