vialroom

#test-results 2024-07-06

Saturday15 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • HPLC_Hank — a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 19:34
  • gip_glp_gil — genuine question a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 19:36
  • u100_pat — update on the earlier thing a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 19:44
  • u100_pat — for the archive is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share 20:18
  • VialBot — Verification log updated: Homopeptide — evidence added, status unchanged. 20:37
HH

a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier

⚠️4📉1📈7
GG

genuine question a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by

U1

update on the earlier thing a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached

U1

is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure

GG

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

attach the pdf

GG

how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier

U1

for the archive is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share

1🔥1⚠️7

is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled

VB

Verification log updated: Homopeptide — evidence added, status unchanged.

HH

anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial

HH

whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing

test it again