thats a fill problem
#test-results 2024-07-18
Thursday20 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- cold_chain_cmdr — i told SWB about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 13:50
- area_percent — the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier, happy to be corrected 14:07
- VialBot — Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 45 awaiting dispatch. 14:11
- ten_of_ten — has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here 15:51
- cold_chain_cmdr — i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice 16:06
i told SWB about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier, happy to be corrected
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 45 awaiting dispatch.
👀2👍15
when did you buy it
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
weigh it first
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
❤️16🧊2
how much does sample handling on my end affect the number
do you test every order or sample it
👀1
test it again
99.2 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
selection bias
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
💀11✅1
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier