99.4 against a certificate of 99 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
#test-results 2024-08-21
- monoisotopic — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, take that with a pinch of salt 21:33
- monoisotopic — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 22:05
- monoisotopic — assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem 22:39
- subq_sy — update on the earlier thing update from 5 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both 23:00
- subq_sy — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later 23:58
unrelated but has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, take that with a pinch of salt
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
nice result
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
test it again
thats a fill problem
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem
[edited]update on the earlier thing update from 5 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both
thats not great
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later