anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
#test-results 2024-09-01
Sunday10 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- area_percent — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, ask me again in a month 23:29
- area_percent — the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier 23:31
- gip_glp_gil — one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally 23:35
- gip_glp_gil — is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit 23:38
- septum_sal — i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia 23:41
thats within range
log the lot number
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, ask me again in a month
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier
thats a fill problem
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
👍4😂3
is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
🙏1💀3😂12
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
nice result