is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
#test-results 2024-09-22
Sunday13 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vial_ledger — posting my Janoshik result on lot A-2601, what do people make of it 17:06
- vial_ledger — if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, still working it out 17:11
- underfill_uma — quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for 17:12
- blind_submit — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later 17:44
thats a fill problem
selection bias
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
when did you buy it
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
posting my Janoshik result on lot A-2601, what do people make of it
[edited]😂1✅2🤝14
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, still working it out
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
🎉10🔥13
certificate said 98.6 and the independent came back 99.4, is that a problem
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
🤝16❤️2🧪1
attach the pdf