for the archive anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
#test-results 2024-09-29
Sunday10 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- food_noise_off — i told KP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 18:45
- VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 128 messages from 57 members. 18:50
- taper_tess — coming back after 8 months with a follow up result, where do i put it 18:53
- taper_tess — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such, take that with a pinch of salt 19:16
- noct.titrate — sorry to jump in i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, i have it written down somewhere 19:51
i told KP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
attach the pdf
Channel stats, last 30 days: 128 messages from 57 members.
🎉1😂12
slightly off topic but anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs
coming back after 8 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
❤️18👀18😂15
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such, take that with a pinch of salt
coming back to this is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
sorry to jump in i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, i have it written down somewhere