vialroom

#test-results 2024-11-10

Sunday29 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • point_two_five — i told KP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures… 20:14
  • point_two_five — the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real 20:31
  • VialBot — Verification log updated: BCH — evidence added, status unchanged. 20:55
VL

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

VL

quick one is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure

log the lot number

does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier

PT

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

i told KP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture

VI

my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them

which lab

PT

the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real

💀5📈1🧊1
VI

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm

VB

Verification log updated: BCH — evidence added, status unchanged.

NP

quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for

*PeptideMeter not the other one

certificate said 98.1 and the independent came back 99.4, is that a problem

NP

a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you

VI

follow up posting my Medutest result on lot G-0641, what do people make of it

1🔥1
VI

sorry to jump in is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled

[edited]