thats not great
#test-results 2024-11-26
Tuesday21 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- turnaround_tam — is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you 19:11
- ruo_only — one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally 19:13
- ruo_only — if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1, still working it out 20:45
- turnaround_tam — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 20:57
- ruo_only — i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, take that with a pinch of salt if the vial has been through a bad… 21:02
is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
🧪1🔥16🙏2
thats a fill problem
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
✅15🎉1🧪6
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
nice result
🙏5
update from 4 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, i could be wrong
when did you buy it
👀8⚠️10
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
thats within range
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
whats the lot
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1, still working it out
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
🧊18🧪3❤️10
quick one i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, take that with a pinch of salt
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
certificate said 98.6 and the independent came back 97.4, is that a problem