if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1, we shall see
#test-results 2024-12-05
Thursday11 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- madrid_mg — my sheet has 6 lots from SWB with a spread under a point, which is tight 17:02
- HPLC_Hank — i told MKM about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 17:06
- madrid_mg — sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, anyway 17:29
- madrid_mg — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 19:55
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern
my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them
my sheet has 6 lots from SWB with a spread under a point, which is tight
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
i told MKM about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, anyway
👍11👀1💀12
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 664 KB · not retained in the public archive
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, we shall see