if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, your mileage will differ
#test-results 2025-01-17
Friday14 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- ms_ms_mira — log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture 18:48
- blind_submit — what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, ymmv one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good… 19:22
- gradient_greg — do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious 19:37
- gradient_greg — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such 19:45
is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share
*Medutest not the other one
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture
lot bought purity assay/label
A-2418 2025-03 99.1% 9.6 / 10mg
A-2601 2025-08 98.7% 9.8 / 10mg
B-0114 2026-01 99.3% 9.4 / 10mg
B-0329 2026-04 98.9% 9.9 / 10mg🧊1
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, ymmv
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious
👀1🙏15🤝5
posting my Medutest result on lot B-0329, what do people make of it
🔥4
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
💀8👍16✅2
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1, thats one data point
📉1
selection bias
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally