sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, take that with a pinch of salt
#test-results 2025-02-09
Sunday15 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- maintenance_mo — is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled 23:23
- warsaw_vial — a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 23:25
- batch_bandit — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, thats one data point 23:36
- a1c_lag — my sheet has 5 lots from GGPeps with a spread under a point, which is tight 23:41
- a1c_lag — is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit 23:46
thats not great
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
🤝9📈1
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
👍7
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
Reminder for maintenance_mo: dose day is today. Set 4 days ago.
nice result
⚠️5
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, thats one data point
📉2🎉16
attach the pdf
my sheet has 5 lots from GGPeps with a spread under a point, which is tight
is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
🧪7🤝1📉1
my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia, i could be wrong