weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
#test-results 2025-02-15
Saturday15 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- batch_bandit — has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here 13:47
- deamidation — slightly off topic but if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier 13:48
- area_percent — coming back after 20 months with a follow up result, where do i put it 15:43
- area_percent — what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, someone check my working 15:44
- monoisotopic — 98.6 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question 15:56
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
✅14🧊1📉18
slightly off topic but if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
update from 19 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
log the boring ones
one data point
coming back after 20 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
🧪10📈17
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, someone check my working
log the lot number
[edited]98.6 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
weigh it first
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled