nice result
#test-results 2025-02-17
Monday10 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- batch_bandit — the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier 14:05
- blind_submit — while im here whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next 14:08
- batch_bandit — a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 14:25
- batch_bandit — assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem 14:58
- batch_bandit — while im here is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure 15:35
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier
log the lot number
*Janoshik not the other one
while im here whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
💀2📈1
assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem
while im here is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
whats the lot