if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
#test-results 2025-02-21
Friday11 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- taper_tess — my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more 09:01
- knees_first — coming back to this post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later 10:18
- vial_ledger — underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure 10:19
my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more
🧊14🙏14🧪4
log the boring ones
log the lot number
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
attach the pdf
thats within range
coming back to this post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure