thats not great
#test-results 2025-03-02
Sunday20 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
thats a fill problem
👍3🎉1
test it again
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
update from 19 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
log the lot number
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
🤝13
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
coming back after 7 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
📈5🙏5
whats the lot
💀16❤️6
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
log the boring ones
attach the pdf
Verification log updated: ERP — evidence added, status unchanged.
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
slightly off topic but is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
selection bias