vialroom

#test-results 2025-05-27

Tuesday11 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • cold_start_cy — slightly off topic but a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 17:33
  • batch_bandit — 99.4 against a certificate of 98.6 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question 17:55
  • impersonator_ip — the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier 17:57
  • impersonator_ip — my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ 20:14
CS

slightly off topic but a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier

99.4 against a certificate of 98.6 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

II

the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier

[edited]
CS

update from 9 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both

posting my Janoshik result on lot E-2205, what do people make of it

CS

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure, ymmv