i told TFC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, i could be wrong
#test-results 2025-06-26
Thursday11 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- coelution_cai — i told TFC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, i could be wrong 21:24
- related_subs — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial 21:49
- verify_or_dont — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 21:53
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
[edited]one data point
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
❤️13😂16
21:51quiet.hours pinned a message to this channel
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
💀13👍1📈1
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
🧪5
the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real, i have it written down somewhere
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
selection bias
lot-log.csv
536 rows · not retained in the public archive
👀1💀13🤝10