#test-results 2025-07-28

Monday14 messages3 participantstimes are UTC

Highlights from this day

nausea_window — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, ask me again in a month 19:40
seven_five_sweet — my sheet has 6 lots from TFC with a spread under a point, which is tight 21:27
chlorhex — is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure 21:38

attach the pdf

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, ask me again in a month

whats the lot

one data point

i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia

my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm

update from 21 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both

coming back to this coming back after 17 months with a follow up result, where do i put it

[edited]

my sheet has 6 lots from TFC with a spread under a point, which is tight

a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached, n of 1 obviously

my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more

thats within range

is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure

😂15❤️18